Thursday, November 12, 2026

Lego's Smart Brick Wins CES 2026 Best in Show Award, Revolutionizes Interactive Play with VR Tech Demo

Lego's Smart Brick wins Best in Show at CES 2026, offering an immersive VR learning experience for kids.

LM Salvado

January 18, 2026

Lego's Smart Brick Wins CES 2026 Best in Show Award, Revolutionizes Interactive Play with VR Tech Demo
Image generated by AI for illustrative purposes. Not actual footage or photography from the reported events.
Loading stream...

At CES 2026, Lego's innovative Smart Brick took home the prestigious Best in Show award, showcasing a new era in interactive play. According to The Verge AI, the demonstration by Lego designer Maarten Simons was so compelling that viewers were transported into an immersive experience, thanks to a 15-minute uncut VR demo filmed on-site.

The Lego Smart Brick represents a significant leap forward in educational toys, blending traditional building blocks with advanced technology. This integration allows for a more engaging and interactive learning experience, potentially revolutionizing how children learn through play. The Verge AI reported that the demo was captured using a modified Qoocam Q3 Ultra camera, capable of creating spatial stereoscopic 3D video that can be viewed in various ways, including VR headsets like the Meta Quest.

The demo highlights the Smart Brick's capabilities, from basic building to incorporating smart technology that enhances the play experience. Viewers can access the demo via YouTube, where it can be experienced through a VR headset or simply by dragging and tilting their screens. This accessibility makes the technology more approachable for a wide audience, from tech enthusiasts to casual users interested in innovative toys.

Maarten Simons' demonstration at CES 2026 not only showcased the technical prowess of the Lego Smart Brick but also its potential impact on the toy industry. The Verge AI noted that the demo was filmed in 8K, providing a high-resolution experience that is likely to captivate audiences and drive interest in the product.

Looking ahead, the success of the Lego Smart Brick at CES suggests a promising future for tech-integrated toys, potentially setting a new standard for interactive and educational play. As per The Verge AI, the reception of this VR180 technology could influence future content creation trends, depending on subscriber interest and feedback.

LM Salvado

LM Salvado is an AI possibilist — he takes the risks of AI seriously, and still sees the route through them. Founder of Via News Agency, an AI-native newsroom built on full source-traceability, he tracks how AI is reshaping markets, capital, and labor — the quiet shifts that happen before the headlines catch up.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Biotech Catalyst Wave: Late-2026 Clinical Readouts, PDUFA Dates and Capital Restructuring
A dense cluster of Q4 2026 to Q1 2027 clinical and regulatory catalysts spans hepatitis delta (Vir's ECLIPSE/SOLSTICE), hypertension and sleep apnea (Mineralys' lorundrostat, PDUFA 2026-12-22), severe hypertriglyceridemia (plozasiran), oncology (ivonescimab BLA, PDUFA 2026-11-14) and gene therapy (Krystal). Positive data flow from AASLD and AHA presentations is offset by cost-cutting guidance, milestones slipping into 2027, and a delisting process that signals capital-market stress for some issuers. Near-term value hinges on binary FDA decisions and Phase 3 topline readouts in Q1 2027.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Ford Motor Company
Both facts give cash for Ford Motor Company at the same point in time (2025-12-31; FY 2025 year-end and Q4 2025 year-end are the same date). Both are labelled USD, but the values are 23,356,000,000 and 23.356, which cannot both be true in USD. The two numbers agree once the second is read as billions (23.356 bn = 23,356,000,000), so the economic content is consistent and the conflict is a unit/scale error in the Q4 2025 record. The period is not the reason for the conflict: a Q4 and an FY figure at the same year-end date should match.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,995
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,995 facts checked against source5,565 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com