Saturday, September 5, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
News articleMIT Technology Review

Scaling AI agents with trustworthy data

View original at technologyreview.com
MIT Technology Review - Ai Research Title: Scaling AI agents with trustworthy data Date: 2026-08-12 16:51 Source: https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/08/12/1141032/scaling-ai-agents-with-trustworthy-data/ <p>Business and technology leaders need no convincing that the time of agentic AI is here…
Opening lines of the source · MIT Technology Review · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • AI agents will augment or automate 50% of business decisions by 2027.

    60% confidence
  • Within two years, 100% of respondents plan to be using agentic AI, with 69% expecting to use it widely.

    60% confidence
  • In organizations categorized as 'data laggards', AI access to company data falls to 30% or less.

    60% confidence
  • Two-thirds of data laggards say legacy data systems limit AI agent scaling (66%) and prevent agents from making decisions at speed (68%), versus just 8% of data leaders reporting either constraint.

    60% confidence
  • Only around half of surveyed organizations trust that the decisions their AI agents make are accurate and relevant, whereas 100% of data leaders trust their agents' decisions.

    60% confidence
  • Across all surveyed organizations, AI only has access to an average of 45% of company data.

    60% confidence
  • A select group of 'data leaders' ensures access to over 70% of their data and has greater success with agents.

    60% confidence
  • The most important initiative to enable scaling among all respondents is improving access to structured and unstructured data for AI agents, followed by enhancing data and AI governance with business context; data leaders are also focusing heavily on automation of data management.

    60% confidence

Cited in these Via News reports

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Capital Surge Meets Investor Caution: Record Funding Rounds and Government Contracts Amid Valuation Skepticism
A single-week cluster of large AI/fintech funding rounds (Socure, Stability AI, Emerald AI, Generalist AI, Instinct, Gatik, Regent Craft) shows venture capital still pouring into AI infrastructure, identity, and autonomy plays, while Palantir's Army TITAN contract win coincided with a 6% stock drop — signaling that even flagship AI-defense revenue isn't immune to market reassessment of AI valuations. Efficiency-focused innovations like Multiverse Computing's model compression suggest the sector is also pivoting toward cost/inference economics as capital intensity draws scrutiny.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
The same metric (eps) for the same entity (Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC) reported for the identical fiscal period (Q1 2026) and observation date (2026-03-31) has two conflicting values: 3.43 USD_per_share vs 3.08 USD. This is not a temporal change — both observations claim to measure the same point in time. The ~10% discrepancy (0.35 USD difference) is material for a financial metric.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,981
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,981 facts checked against source5,273 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com