Saturday, September 5, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
News articleYahoo Finance· January 13, 2026

New DDN Report Reveals 65% of Organizations Are Struggling to Achieve AI Success

View original at finance.yahoo.com
New DDN Report Reveals 65% of Organizations Are Struggling to Achieve AI Success 600 business and IT decision-makers reveal in "The 2026 AI Infrastructure Report" that unified platforms, cloud strategies, energy expertise, and partnerships are the key to unlocking real AI success CHATSWORTH, Calif., January 13, 2026--(…
Opening lines of the source · Yahoo Finance · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • 76% of leaders face fundamental data challenges, from legacy infrastructure and siloed datasets

    80% confidence
  • 97% of organizations overwhelmingly agree that cloud infrastructure is essential to scaling AI

    80% confidence
  • DDN enables up to 70% reduction in power and cooling costs by keeping GPUs fully saturated and moving data in parallel

    80% confidence
  • 98% of organizations cite a skills shortage in both IT and data science roles as a major barrier to scaling AI

    80% confidence
  • AI workloads are projected to grow 110% in the next year

    80% confidence
  • More than half of respondents cite cloud as their fastest path to production

    80% confidence
  • Scaling AI is an integration problem, not a compute problem

    80% confidence
  • 83% of organizations say their internal teams are struggling with AI workloads today

    80% confidence
  • The real bottleneck in AI is the data layer underneath, not models and GPUs

    80% confidence
  • 93% of organizations are actively seeking to reduce AI's energy impact

    80% confidence
  • 54% of organizations have delayed or canceled AI initiatives in the past two years

    80% confidence
  • 47% of organizations cite power and cooling costs as their top infrastructure constraint

    80% confidence
  • 65% of organizations say their AI environments are too complex to manage

    80% confidence
  • 72% of organizations rely on third-party expertise to build and manage their AI infrastructure, while just 12% depend solely on in-house talent

    80% confidence
  • Google Cloud Managed Lustre empowers organizations to easily scale AI workloads with latest GPUs and TPUs while reducing complexity

    80% confidence
  • 65% of organizations have abandoned AI projects due to a lack of skills

    80% confidence

Cited in these Via News reports

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Capital Surge Meets Investor Caution: Record Funding Rounds and Government Contracts Amid Valuation Skepticism
A single-week cluster of large AI/fintech funding rounds (Socure, Stability AI, Emerald AI, Generalist AI, Instinct, Gatik, Regent Craft) shows venture capital still pouring into AI infrastructure, identity, and autonomy plays, while Palantir's Army TITAN contract win coincided with a 6% stock drop — signaling that even flagship AI-defense revenue isn't immune to market reassessment of AI valuations. Efficiency-focused innovations like Multiverse Computing's model compression suggest the sector is also pivoting toward cost/inference economics as capital intensity draws scrutiny.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
The same metric (eps) for the same entity (Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC) reported for the identical fiscal period (Q1 2026) and observation date (2026-03-31) has two conflicting values: 3.43 USD_per_share vs 3.08 USD. This is not a temporal change — both observations claim to measure the same point in time. The ~10% discrepancy (0.35 USD difference) is material for a financial metric.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,981
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,981 facts checked against source5,273 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com